Appeal No. 1996-3003
Application 08/175,182
mounting board being connected with at least one device which
passes through said casing.” as claimed.
We agree with Appellants that “The three references
cited by the Examiner, when considered individually or in
combination, fail to teach or suggest the invention defined in
Claim 3.” (Brief-page 10.)
Thus, we will not sustain the 35 U.S.C. § 103
rejection of claim 3. The remaining claims on appeal also
contain the above limitations discussed in regard to claim 3
and thereby, we will not sustain the rejection as to these
claims.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007