Ex parte CHEN - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                    
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                      
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                  
                                                               Paper No. 28            


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   ________________                                    
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   ________________                                    
                                Ex parte TEH-KUEI CHEN                                 
                                   ________________                                    
                                 Appeal No. 1996-3017                                  
                              Application No. 07/851,810                               
                                   ________________                                    
                                HEARD:  March 23, 2000                                 
                                   ________________                                    

          Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and OWENS, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                      
          KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         



                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 2-                 
          10, 12, 13 and 17-20.  Appellant has withdrawn the appeal of                 
          claims 1, 11, 15 and 16, the other claims remaining in the                   
          present application.  Claim 2 is reproduced below:                           
                                         -1-                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007