THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 48 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEVEN S. GROSS ____________ Appeal No. 1996-3326 Application No. 08/063,067 ____________ HEARD: April 19, 2000 ____________ Before KIMLIN, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 12, which are the only claims in this application. According to appellant, the invention is directed to two embodiments. The first embodiment involves the administration of known groups of tetrahydrobiopterin synthesis antagonistsPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007