Appeal No. 1996-3326 Application No. 08/063,067 not reach the issue of the sufficiency of the declaration evidence (see the Stuehr and Gross Declarations under 37 CFR § 1.132 dated Nov. 15, 1993, attached to Paper No. 22). In re Geiger, 815 F.2d 686, 688, 2 USPQ2d 1276, 1278 (Fed. Cir. 1987). Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1 through 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. The decision of the examiner is reversed. OTHER ISSUES Upon the return of this application to the jurisdiction of the examiner, the examiner and applicant should consider the patentability of the claims under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting in light of recently issued patents to applicant (see at least U.S. Patents 5,502,050; 5,874,433; 5,877,176; and especially claims 7 and 9 of U.S. Patent No. 5,880,124). REVERSED 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007