Ex parte MARCHIONNI et al. - Page 2




                     Appeal No. 1996-3330                                                                                                                                              
                     Application 07/861,458                                                                                                                                            


                     indicates that appellants failed to file a reply brief addressing  the new ground of rejection                                                                    
                                                                        1                                                                                                              
                     within the time period permitted.  (37 CFR 1.93(b) 1995).  Therefore, the appeal as to                                                                            
                     claims 1-26 and 30-32 is dismissed. Id.  We have considered the issues raised by this                                                                             
                     appeal as they relate to the remaining claims 38-54, 58-60, 66-81, and 85-87.                                                                                     
                                Claim 38 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as follows:                                                                         

                                38.        A method for identifying a structural homologue in a first organism which is                                                                
                     structurally homologous with a gene first identified in a second organism of a non-                                                                               
                     vertebrate phylum, said method comprising the steps of:                                                                                                           
                                (a) detecting, with two or more probes corresponding to nucleotide sequences of                                                                        
                     said gene, hybridization signals in the genome of a third organism which is positioned                                                                            
                     phylogenetically between said first organism and said second organism;                                                                                            
                                (b) cloning said hybridization signals that are detected by at least two of said two or                                                                
                     more probes, determining arrangement or strandedness of                                                                                                           
                     probe-binding regions in said cloned hybridization signals, and selecting candidate                                                                               
                     homologues from said hybridization signals based on sameness in arrangement or                                                                                    
                     strandedness of said probe-binding regions;                                                                                                                       
                                (c) sequencing said probe-binding regions in said candidate homologues and                                                                             
                     selecting putative homologues from said candidate homologues based on presence of an                                                                              
                     open reading frame in said sequence probe-binding regions;                                                                                                        

                                (d) sequencing said putative homologues and selecting structural homologues from                                                                       
                     said putative homologues based on multiple resemblance in structural characteristics;                                                                             


                                1 Several attempts were made during the period of August 28, 2000 through                                                                              
                     September 7, 2000, by Paralegal Specialist Dianne Maggard, to contact appellants'                                                                                 
                     designated representative in an effort to verify that a reply brief in response to the                                                                            
                     Examiner's Answer had not been filed.  Ms. Maggard was unable to ascertain that a reply                                                                           
                     brief had been timely filed.                                                                                                                                      
                                                                                          2                                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007