Appeal No. 1996-3330 Application 07/861,458 (e) using additional two or more probes based on two or more conserved regions among said structural homologues and said gene to detect hybridization signals in the genome of an additional organism which is positioned phylogenetically between said first organisms and said additional organism; and (f) repeating steps b through e until said structural homologue of said first organism is identified. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Webster 5,087,558 Feb. 11, 1992 Chalfie et al. (Chalfie), "The Identification and Suppression of Inherited Neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans," Nature, Vol. 345, pp. 410-416 (1990) Goddard et al. (Goddard), "Isolation and Characterization of Caenorhabditis elegans DNA Sequences Homologous to the v-abl Oncogene," Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol 83, pp. 2172-2176 (1986) Libert et al. (Libert), "Selective Amplification and Cloning of Four New Members of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Family," Science, Vol. 244, pp. 569-572 (1989) Grounds of Rejection Claims 38-54, 58-60, 66-81, and 85-87 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the invention. Claims 38-54, 58-60, 66-81, and 85-87 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies upon Chalfie, Goddard, Webster, and Libert. We reverse. Background The applicants describe the invention, at page 2 of the specification, as being 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007