Appeal No. 1996-3434 Application No. 08/063,279 libraries are not claimed here.@ The examiner=s statement of the rejection addresses the side chains by stating: It would have also been obvious that such libraries would have the carboxamide groups replaced by aminomethyl groups, carboxyl groups replaced by hydroxymethyl, and guanidino groups replaced by amino groups, because one of ordinary skill would have also expected these groups to be reduced by the reductants and procedures which are well known and routine in the art, as one would not be concerned with trying to maintain the structure and activity of a parent peptide. See, Answer, page 6. We have no doubt that the prior art could be modified in a manner consistent with appellants’ specification and claims. That the prior art could be so modified, however, would not have made the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the desirability of the modification. In re Gordon, 733 F.2d 900, 902, 221 USPQ 1125, 1127 (Fed. Cir. 1984). What is lacking from the examiner=s treatment of the claims on appeal is a reason, suggestion or motivation, stemming from the prior art, which would have led a person having ordinary skill to the claimed invention wherein Athe carboxamide groups of said reduced amino acid side chains are replaced by aminomethyl groups, carboxyl groups of said reduced amino acid side chains are replaced by hydroxymethyl groups, and quanidino groups of said reduced amino acid 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007