Appeal No. 1996-3434 Application No. 08/063,279 OTHER ISSUES Upon return of this application, the examiner should review the scope and content of claims 8 and 10 to determine if they are separately patentable. In this regard we direct the examiners attention to MPEP ' 706.03(K) (7th ed., rev. 1, February 2000). REVERSED ) SHERMAN D. WINTERS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. SMITH ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) DONALD E. ADAMS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007