THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was
not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ARTHUR A. CORRY
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3597
Application No. 08/050,825
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before, KIMLIN, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal
to allow claims 1-5, 10-12 and 20 as amended after final
rejection, which are all of the remaining claims in this
application.
Appellant's invention is drawn to a method of making a
flexible mold useful in producing a molded article that is a
replica of a model. All of the appealed method claims include
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007