Ex parte CORRY - Page 9




          Appeal No. 1996-3597                                         Page 9            
          Application No. 08/050,825                                                     


          facie obviousness of the claimed invention as a whole,                         
          including each and every limitation of the claims.  In re                      
          Fine, 837 F.2d 1071, 1075, 5 USPQ 1596, 1600 (Fed. Cir. 1988);                 
          In re Warner, 379 F.2d 1011, 1017, 154 USPQ 173, 178 (CCPA                     
          1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1057 (1967).  Accordingly, we                    
          shall not sustain the examiner*s rejection of the appealed                     
          claims under 35 U.S.C.                                                         
           103.                                                                         
                                       CONCLUSION                                        
               The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1-5, 10-12                  
          and 20 under 35 U.S.C.  112, second paragraph as being                        
          indefinite for failing to particularly point out and                           
          distinctly claim the subject matter which appellant regards as                 
          the invention and to reject claims 1-5, 10-12 and 20 under 35                  
          U.S.C.  103 as being                                                          

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007