THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte RICHARD H. YOUNG SR., AMAR N. NEOGI
AND MICHAEL R. HANSEN
________________
Appeal No. 1996-3683
Application 08/207,3931
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before METZ, JOHN DOUGLAS SMITH and OWENS, Administrative
Patent Judges.
METZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Application for patent filed March 7, 1994. According1
to the official records of the United States Patent
and Trademark Office, said application is a
continuation of Serial Number 07/890,040, filed on
May 27, 1992, and now abandoned, which is a
continuation of Serial Number 07/326,188, filed
March 20, 1989, and now U.S. Patent Number
5,230,959, issued on July 27, 1993.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007