THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte STEVEN M. PENN, DAVID N. JONES and MICHAEL E. EMBREE
__________
Appeal No. 1997-0068
Application 07/923,2781
___________
HEARD: February 7, 2000
___________
Before COHEN, McQUADE and GONZALES, Administrative Patent
Judges.
McQUADE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Steven M. Penn et al. appeal from the final rejection of
claims 24 through 43, all of the claims pending in the
1Application for patent filed July 31, 1992. According
to appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 07/905,069, filed June 24, 1992, now U.S. Patent
No. 5,260,009, issued November 9, 1993; which is continuation
of Application 07/648,081, filed January 31, 1991, now
abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007