THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AMY H. CHU and MICHAEL J. WILCOX
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0204
Application No. 08/400,786
____________
HEARD: February 22, 2000
____________
Before GARRIS, PAK, and WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 28 through 37, 39 through 42 and 44
which are all of the claims pending in the application.
Claims 28 and 41 were amended subsequent to the final Office
action dated December 18, 1995, Paper No. 15.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007