Ex parte SITES et al. - Page 1




                                            THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                                                               
                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                                                                                  
                              (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                                                                                 
                     (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                                                                                        
                                                                                                                      Paper No. 29                                                     


                                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                               
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                      BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                               
                                                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             

                                         Ex parte RICHARD L. SITES and RICHARD T. WITEK                                                                                                
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                     Appeal No. 1997-0586                                                                                              
                                                                   Application 08/243,559                                                                                              
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             
                                                                                  ON BRIEF                                                                                             
                                                                          ________________                                                                                             

                     Before LALL, DIXON and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                                                       
                     LALL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                                                


                                                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                             

                     This is an appeal from the final rejection  of claims 1 to                                1                                                                       


                                1An amendment after the final rejection was filed                                                                                                      
                     [paper no. 21], however, no changes to the claims were made.                                                                                                      
                                                                                          1                                                                                            





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007