THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WALTER L. DAVIS
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0606
Application No. 08/169,048
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, FLEMING and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-29, which
constitute all the claims in the application.
The disclosed invention pertains to a combination paging
system and telephone system. More particularly, the invention
relates to the routing of paging messages intended for a
portable transceiver which can be located outside of a home
calling area. The portable transceiver continually informs
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007