Ex parte WEIS-FOGH - Page 1





                              The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication                                
                                                       and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                       

                                                                                                                        Paper No. 27                    

                                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                       
                                                                   ____________                                                                         

                                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                        
                                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         

                                                         Ex parte ULLA S. WEIS-FOGH                                                                     
                                                                   ____________                                                                         

                                                              Appeal No. 1997-0875                                                                      
                                                           Application No. 07/998,1281                                                                  
                                                                   ____________                                                                         

                                                                      ON BRIEF                                                                          
                                                                   ____________                                                                         

                 Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SPIEGEL, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                          
                 SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                                  





                                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                         

                          This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's final                                                  

                 rejection of claims 55 through 64, 67 and 68, which are all of the claims pending in this                                              
                                 2                                                                                                                      
                 application.   Claims 1 and 68 are illustrative and read as follows:                                                                   



                          1Application for patent filed December 29, 1992.  According to appellant, this application is a                               
                 continuation of application no. 07/704,911 filed May 21, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of                               
                 application no. 07/465,530 filed January 17, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application                               
                 no. 07/216,712 filed July 5, 1988 under 35 U.S.C.  371, now abandoned, which is the national stage of                                 
                 International Patent Application PCT/DK87/00117, having an international filing date of October 2, 1987.                               
                          2Entry of the amendment filed May 8, 1995 (Paper No. 16) cancelling non-elected claims 34-54, 65                              
                 and 66 was authorized by the examiner in the answer (Paper No. 24, p. 2).                                                              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007