The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ULLA S. WEIS-FOGH
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0875
Application No. 07/998,1281
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before WILLIAM F. SMITH, SPIEGEL, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 55 through 64, 67 and 68, which are all of the claims pending in this
2
application. Claims 1 and 68 are illustrative and read as follows:
1Application for patent filed December 29, 1992. According to appellant, this application is a
continuation of application no. 07/704,911 filed May 21, 1991, now abandoned, which is a continuation of
application no. 07/465,530 filed January 17, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation of application
no. 07/216,712 filed July 5, 1988 under 35 U.S.C. § 371, now abandoned, which is the national stage of
International Patent Application PCT/DK87/00117, having an international filing date of October 2, 1987.
2Entry of the amendment filed May 8, 1995 (Paper No. 16) cancelling non-elected claims 34-54, 65
and 66 was authorized by the examiner in the answer (Paper No. 24, p. 2).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007