THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DIRKJAN BAKKER,
JOHANNES J. GROTE, and
CLEMENS A. VAN BLITTERSWIJK
____________
Appeal No. 1997-0975
Application No. 08/389,3031
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, OWENS, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's refusal to
allow claims 41-48 and 52-59. Claims 49-51, which are all of the
1 Application for patent filed February 16, 1995. According
to appellants, this application is a division of Application
08/089,854, filed July 12, 1993; which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 07/907,674, filed July 2, 1992, now abandoned;
which is a continuation-in-part of Application 07/479,197, filed
February 13, 1990, now abandoned; which is a continuation-in-part
of Application 07/240,810, filed September 2, 1988, now
abandoned.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007