Appeal No. 1997-0975 Page 9 Application No. 08/389,303 CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 41-48 and 52-59 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Jones or, alternatively, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Jones is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED CHUNG K. PAK ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT TERRY J. OWENS ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) PETER F. KRATZ ) Administrative Patent Judge ) tdlPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007