Appeal No. 1997-0975 Page 2 Application No. 08/389,303 remaining claims pending in this application, stand objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim (final rejection, page 5). BACKGROUND Appellant's invention relates to a process for implanting into an animal a prosthetic device for binding to bone. An understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 54, which is reproduced below. 54. A process for providing an animal with a prosthetic device for binding to bone, comprising: implanting into an animal a prosthetic device, said prosthetic device being implanted to bind the prosthetic device to bone by contact between said prosthetic device and bone, said prosthetic device comprising a polymer including a first component comprising a polyalkylene glycol; and a second hydrophobic component which imparts stability to the first component in water. The sole prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Jones et al. (Jones) 3,908,201 Sep. 30, 1975 Claims 41-48 and 52-59 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Jones or, alternatively, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Jones. OPINION Having carefully reviewed the respective positions of appellants and the examiner, including the declaration evidencePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007