Appeal No. 1997-1285 Page 10 Application No. 08/307,153 incorporate the fold of Suzuki into the product design of FR 196. Therefore, we must conclude that the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case in regard to the subject matter of claim 36. In view of the above discussion, we conclude that the examiner has established a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the subject matter of claims 20, 26, 29, 30 and the claims that stand or fall with those claims, but has failed to establish a prima facie case of obvious with respect to the subject matter of claims 33 and 36. CONCLUSION To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 20 and 26-32, 34, 35, and 37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is affirmed. The decision of the examiner to reject claims 33 and 36 is reversed.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007