Ex parte MCCALLION - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                                       Paper No. 22                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                  ________________                                    
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                  ________________                                    
                             Ex parte JAMES P. McCALLION                              
                                  ________________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1997-1451                                  
                               Application 08/145,974                                 
                                  ________________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                  ________________                                    
          Before JOHN D. SMITH, GARRIS and TIMM, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                        


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on an appeal which involves claims 1,               
          2, 4, 5 and 16.  The only other claims remaining in the                     
          application, which are claims 6-13 and 15, stand withdrawn                  
          from further consideration by the examiner as being directed                
          to a non-elected invention.                                                 
                                         -1-                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007