Ex parte SHOURESHI - Page 4




                 Appeal No.  1997-1573                                                                                                                  
                 Application No.  08/276,551                                                                                                            


                 rejected under 35 U.S.C.  103 as being unpatentable over                                                                              
                 Bozich in view of the “well known prior art ."                               3                                                         



























                          3Although not explicitly stated in the sentence setting                                                                       
                 forth the basis for the 35 U.S.C.  103 rejection, it is                                                                               
                 apparent from the Examiner’s discussion at page 6 of the                                                                               
                 Answer that the phrase “well known prior art” is intended to                                                                           
                 refer to Appellant’s admissions regarding the Hopfield neural                                                                          
                 network at page 23 of the specification.                                                                                               
                                                                           4                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007