Appeal No. 1997-1573
Application No. 08/276,551
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Bozich in view of the “well known prior art ." 3
3Although not explicitly stated in the sentence setting
forth the basis for the 35 U.S.C. § 103 rejection, it is
apparent from the Examiner’s discussion at page 6 of the
Answer that the phrase “well known prior art” is intended to
refer to Appellant’s admissions regarding the Hopfield neural
network at page 23 of the specification.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007