Ex parte SHOURESHI - Page 10




          Appeal No.  1997-1573                                                       
          Application No.  08/276,551                                                 


          (CCPA 1966).  Accordingly, since all of the limitations are                 
          not taught or suggested by the prior art, we do not sustain                 
          the obviousness rejection of independent claim 1, nor of                    
          claims 2, 4, 7 through 9, 15, and 16 dependent thereon.                     
               In conclusion we have not sustained the 35 U.S.C.                      
           103 rejection of appealed claims 1, 2, 4, 7 through 9, 15,                
          and 16.  Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims                
          1, 2, 4, 7 through 9, 15, and 16 is reversed.                               
                                      REVERSED                                        

                                                      )                              
                         KENNETH W. HAIRSTON                )                         
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )                              
                                                       )  BOARD OF PATENT             
                         JERRY SMITH                   )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )   APPEALS AND                
                                                       )                              
                                                       )  INTERFERENCES               
                                                       )                              
                         JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO            )                              
                         Administrative Patent Judge   )                              
          JFR:hh                                                                      






                                         10                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007