Appeal No. 1997-1573
Application No. 08/276,551
(CCPA 1966). Accordingly, since all of the limitations are
not taught or suggested by the prior art, we do not sustain
the obviousness rejection of independent claim 1, nor of
claims 2, 4, 7 through 9, 15, and 16 dependent thereon.
In conclusion we have not sustained the 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 rejection of appealed claims 1, 2, 4, 7 through 9, 15,
and 16. Therefore, the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims
1, 2, 4, 7 through 9, 15, and 16 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
KENNETH W. HAIRSTON )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007