The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FRANK T. SECCO D'ARAGONA,
DAVID D. OLIVER and RAYMOND C. WELLS
_____________
Appeal 1997-1618
Application 08/368,0781
______________
Before: WILLIAM F. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge,
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and KRATZ,
Administrative Patent Judge.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Upon consideration of the Appeal Brief (Paper 12) and the
Examiner's Answer (Paper 13), it is
ORDERED that the examiner's first rejection
(Examiner's Answer, page 4) of claims 1-3, 5-9, 11 and 13-19
Application for patent filed 3 January 1995. The real party in interest is1
Motorola, Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007