THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte JOHN B. MILLER
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-1676
Application 08/255,0101
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before JOHN D. SMITH, PAK, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed June 7, 1994. According to
appellant, this application is a continuation-in-part of
Application 08/056,608, filed May 3, 1993; which is a
continuation of Application 07/854,975, filed March 23, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007