Appeal No. 1997-1676 Application No. 08/255,010 invention. Accordingly, we are also constrained to agree with appellant that the examiner has not established a prima facie case of obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the Manning disclosure or unpatentability under the judicially created doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting over the claims of Application 08/342,636 in view of Manning. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007