The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 19 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HIROHIDE MIWA and MASATO KINO ____________ Appeal No. 1997-1817 Application No. 08/139,6931 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ROBINSON, SPIEGEL, and SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judges. SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 through 16. Claims 17 through 48, the only other claims pending in the application, have been withdrawn from further consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as not readable on the elected invention. Claims 1, 2 and 6 through 8 are illustrative and read as follows: 1 Application for patent filed October 22, 1993.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007