The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ZAKAUDDIN T. CHOWHAN and PATRICK H. VO
_____________
Appeal 97-1939
Application 08/375,0491
______________
Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and
SCHAFER and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.
Decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
Upon consideration of applicants' Appeal Brief (Paper 21)
and the Examiner's Answer (Paper 22), it is
ORDERED that the examiner's rejection of claims 37-
38, 42-43 and 45-46 as being unpatentable under 35 U.S.C.
Application for patent filed 18 January 1995. The application on appeal is said1
to be a continuation of application 08/038,597, filed 16 March 1993. The real party in
interest is Syntex (U.S.A.) Inc.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007