Ex Parte WARNES et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-2023                                                        
          Application No. 08/197,497                                                  


          invention (Final Rejection dated May 3, 1995, Paper No. 13, page            
          2).                                                                         
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          method of forming an aluminide diffusion coating including an               
          additive element by chemical vapor deposition on a substrate                
          where first and second sources comprising aluminum and an                   
          additive element are disposed outside the coating retort (Brief,            
          page 1).1  Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on                 
          appeal and a copy of this claim is reproduced below:                        
                    1.  A method of forming by chemical vapor                         
               deposition on a substrate an aluminide diffusion coating               
               including an additive element, comprising flowing a first              
               halide precursor gas in a carrier gas in contact with                  
               a first source comprising aluminum disposed outside a                  
               coating retort to generate an aluminum halide first                    
               coating gas, flowing a second halide precursor gas in a                
               carrier gas in contact with a second source comprising                 
               the additive element disposed outside the coating retort               
               to generate a second halide coating gas, and introducing               
               the first and second coating gases concurrently into                   
               a coating retort in which the substrate at coating                     
               temperature is disposed to codeposit aluminum and                      




               1It is noted that “Appellants’ Response to Examiner’s                  
          Answer” (hereafter “Response”) dated Mar. 20, 1996, Paper No. 21,           
          was refused entry by the examiner (Supplemental Examiner’s Answer           
          dated Sep. 16, 1996, Paper No. 22).  Since the time period for              
          appellants’ petition under 37 CFR § 1.181 of this refusal has               
          expired, appellants’ Response has not been considered as part of            
          the appeal record.                                                          
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007