Appeal No. 1997-2188 Application 08/137,440 treatment of Alzheimer's disease, the only disease mentioned in their specification as including as a symptom thereof memory loss due to decreased cholinergic function. The examiner explains that appellants have failed to present adequately reliable information in their disclosure for effectively treating Alzheimer's disease. Specifically, the examiner questions the reliability of appellants' screening method for screening prospective drug candidates for treatment of memory dysfunction characterized by decreased cholinergic function. The examiner also questions whether appellants use of the Dark Avoidance Test can reliably predict efficacy in2 humans of the claimed compounds. At page 2 of his Answer, the examiner has listed various prior art references which serve as the evidence which supports his rejection. Of all the listed prior art the examiner has proffered as evidence in support of his rejection, we find the article by Han et al. in the European Journal of Medical Chemistry to be the most relevant reference to the issues presented for our determination. Han et al. See page 7, line 23 through page 8, line 13 of the2 specification for an explanation of the Dark Avoidance Test. 12Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007