THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte FERNANDO MACIAS-GARZA,
TODD W. MILLER,
and
MONTGOMERY C. McGRAW
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-2399
Application No. 08/355,104
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims
1 through 28.
The disclosed invention relates to a method and apparatus
for detecting inconsistencies in two microprocessors via the
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007