Appeal No. 1997-2512 Application No. 08/118,905 the issues relating to the § 112 rejections are not part of this appeal, and the only issues to be resolved in this appeal are as follows: 1. Whether the examiner erred by finally rejecting claims 12 and 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Whittaker; and 3 2. Whether the examiner erred by finally rejecting claims 14 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Frenkel in view of Whittaker or Cassou.4 We reverse both the rejections. In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have reviewed the specification, the claims, and the applied prior art, including all of the arguments advanced by the appellants and the examiner in support of their respective positions. As a result of this review, we make the determinations below. Claim Interpretation 3 The statement of rejection on page 3 (2nd full paragraph) of the Examiner’s Answer indicates that claims 12-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. However, it appears that this statement contains a typographical error, since only claims 14 and 15 are indicated as rejected under this same ground on page 5 (last paragraph) of the Answer and also on page 5 (paragraph 32) of the final Office action. 4 The statement of rejection on page 3 (2nd full paragraph) of the Answer fails to mention Cassou as one of the references relied upon to establish obviousness. However, the Examiner’s Answer at page 2 lists Cassou as one of the references relied upon to reject the claims on appeal. In addition, the statement of rejection on page 5 (paragraph 32) of the final Office action expressly includes Cassou as one of the references relied upon to support the examiner’s conclusion of obviousness. Therefore, it appears that the examiner’s omission of Cassou from the statement of rejection in the Answer was inadvertent. Accordingly, we will consider Cassou in this instance to avoid the possibility of piecemeal appeal and to ensure administrative efficiency. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007