Appeal No. 1997-2678 Application No. 08/347,270 one of said terminals for immediately transmitting selected stored information to said terminal; and means responsive to an order received from a terminal for updating data in said means for storing; whereby said system can be used by said entities, each using one of said terminals to exchange information, and to respond to inquiries and orders instantaneously and over a period of time. The examiner relies on the following references: Lockwood et al. (Lockwood) 4,3259,631 Nov. 16, 1982 Young "Computer Firm To Help Buyers Shop for Loans." Washington Post, published April 7, 1984 Claims 1 and 11-15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as relying on an inadequate written description and a nonenabling disclosure. Claims 1 and 11-15 stand further rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Lockwood in view of Loan Express. Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the respective positions of appellant and the examiner. OPINION We reverse. Turning first to the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, at first it appears that the examiner bases 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007