Ex parte LOCKWOOD - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1997-2678                                                        
          Application No. 08/347,270                                                  


          processor.  This claim language appears to go to the disclosed              
          feature of the system making a loan application decision based              
          on both user application form entries and on data received,                 
          for example, from a credit bureau.  We find no such teaching                
          in Lockwood and the rather sparse teachings of Loan Express do              
          not provide for the deficiencies of Lockwood in this regard.                
          Further, the examiner has not presented any convincing                      
          explanation as to why this fetching means responsive to both                
          data entry and information received from the central processor              
          would have been an obvious modification to Lockwood.                        
               Accordingly, the examiner has not established a prima                  
          facie case of obviousness with regard to the instant claimed                
          subject matter and we will not sustain the rejection of claims              
          1 and                                                                       
          11-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                











                                         11                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007