Ex parte HIKMET et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 24              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                               Ex parte RIFAT HIKMET,                                 
                                   RALF RAUE and                                      
                                    THOMAS WELKER                                     
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1997-2682                                  
                               Application 08/382,937                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    

          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING and RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent                
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of               
          claims 1, 2, 6, and 9.  Claims 3, 5, and 7 have been canceled.              
          Claims 4, 8, and 10 through 14 have been indicated by the                   
          Examiner as containing allowable subject matter.                            

                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007