Ex parte HIKMET et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-2682                                                        
          Application No. 08/382,937                                                  


               The claimed invention relates to a light source in which               
          light emitted from a stimulated luminescent layer is guided                 
          through an optical filter.  More particularly, Appellants                   
          indicate at pages 2 and 3 of the specification that the                     
          optical filter is a cholesteric filter having at least one                  
          cholesteric crystal layer.                                                  
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
               1.   A light source having a luminescent layer, means for              
               stimulating light emission from the layer in a first                   
                    wavelength range, and an optical filter for                       
          filtering the       emitted light, characterized in that the                
          optical filter is a cholesteric filter comprising at least                  
          one cholesteric     crystal layer.                                          
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Adams et al.  (Adams)         3,697,152                Oct. 10,             
                                                                 1972                 
          Welker et al. (Welker)        5,089,883                Feb. 18,             
                                                                 1992                 
          Shanks                        5,193,015                Mar. 09,             
                                                                 1993                 
                                                  (Filed Oct. 05, 1990)               
          Barnik et al. (Barnik)        5,235,443                Aug. 10,             
                                                                 1993                 
                                                  (Filed Feb. 24, 1992)               
               Claims 1, 2, 6, and 9 stand finally rejected under                     
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Welker in view of                
          Adams, Shanks, and Barnik.                                                  
                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007