The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD J. HUANG and ROBIN W. CHEUNG
____________
Appeal No. 1997-3338
Application No. 08/402,252
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before PAK, KRATZ, and DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judges.
DELMENDO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 4, 8, and 13 as
amended subsequent to the final rejection. These are the only
claims remaining in the application.1
1The appellants canceled claim 9 in the “AMENDMENT UNDER
37 CFR § 1.116” filed December 19, 1995 (Paper 5). According
to the advisory action of January 26, 1996 (Paper 6), this
amendment was approved for entry subject to the filing of an
appeal.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007