The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 14
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte LAVAUGHN F. WATTS, JR., KEVIN D. DAVIS,
ROBERT E. TONSING, TOM GRIMM,
LARRY MITCHAM, ROBERT MOORE, and GARY VERDUN
_____________
Appeal No. 1997-3423
Application 08/336,1341
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-10 and 12-28, all of
the pending claims, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e). We affirm-in-
part.
1Application for patent filed November 8, 1994.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007