Ex parte SAKUI et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 1997-3444                                                        
          Application 08/268,728                                                      

          Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from                
          the final rejection of claims 21-31 and 35.  Claims 36 and 37               
          have been withdrawn from consideration as directed to a                     
          non-elected invention.                                                      
               We reverse.                                                            
                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               The disclosed invention is directed to a semiconductor                 
          device including a bipolar transistor operating based on the                
          reverse base current (RBC) effect discovered by Appellants to               
          exist in the bipolar transistor.                                            
               Claim 21 is reproduced below.2                                         
                    21.  A semiconductor device comprising:                           
                    a bipolar transistor having a base, an emitter, a                 
               collector, a base-emitter junction and a collector-base                
               junction, said bipolar transistor having a first                       
               operating region such that with a positive base-emitter                
               voltage V  in a first range and a predetermined positive               
                        BE                                                            

            In claim 21, as amended in Paper No. 36, "V " has been2                                             BE                       
          miscopied from the amendment of Paper No. 21 as "VBE" in two                
          places.  This should be corrected because the claims will be                
          printed from this amendment.                                                
                                        - 2 -                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007