Appeal No. 1997-3515
Application No. 08/390,226
A prima facie case of obviousness therefore has not been
established with regard to the subject matter of claim 20, and
we will not sustain the rejection. Nor will we sustain the
rejection of claims 21 -23, which depend from claim 20.
SUMMARY
Neither rejection is sustained.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
)
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOHN P. McQUADE )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
NEA:hh
16
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007