Ex parte EICKEN et al. - Page 1




                                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                                  for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.                 

                                                                                                     Paper No. 21             


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                         ____________                                                         

                                       BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                         ____________                                                         

                         Ex parte ULRICH EICKEN, RAYMOND MATHIS and NORBERT BIALAS                                            
                                                         ___________                                                          

                                                     Appeal No. 1997-3589                                                     
                                                  Application No. 08/117,013                                                  
                                                         ____________                                                         

                                                          ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                         ____________                                                         

              Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                         
              TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                           


                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        

                      This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11-28, which are all of      

              the claims pending in this application.                                                                         

                      We Reverse.                                                                                             

                                                        The Invention                                                         

                      The appellants' invention relates to a spin finish composition for lubricating synthetic filament       

              fibers (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the            

              appellants' brief.  Independent claim 11 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:                 






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007