The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ULRICH EICKEN, RAYMOND MATHIS and NORBERT BIALAS ___________ Appeal No. 1997-3589 Application No. 08/117,013 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before KIMLIN, JOHN D. SMITH and TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 11-28, which are all of the claims pending in this application. We Reverse. The Invention The appellants' invention relates to a spin finish composition for lubricating synthetic filament fibers (specification, p. 1). A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief. Independent claim 11 is illustrative of the invention and reads as follows:Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007