Appeal No. 1997-3589
Application No. 08/117,013
Observation
In the event of further prosecution of this application, we note that both claims 11 and 19 refer
to “the” blocks A) and B) without proper antecedent basis. This discrepancy should be resolved upon
further prosecution.
Conclusion
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 11, 12, 16-18 under 35 U.S.C.
§102(b), claims 13-15 under 103(a) over Yanai and claims 19-28 under 103(a) over Fujita in view of
Yanai is Reversed.
Page 11
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007