Appeal No. 1997-3589 Application No. 08/117,013 Block Copolyester As the lubricant component “consists” of the copolyester, no additional unspecified ingredients may be present in the lubricant component other than the claimed copolyester. Specifically, the term “consisting of” in the body of a claim closes that particular element of the claim to the inclusion of additional components. Mannesmann Demag Corp. v. Engineered Metal Products Co., 793 F.2d 1279, 230 USPQ 45 (Fed. Cir. 1986). Thus, the only ingredient in the lubricant component is the recited copolyester. Yet, the lubricant component copolyester being “prepared from” blocks A) and B) is not limited to a copolyester having only blocks A) and B). The term “prepared from” is interpreted as open ended terminology as the specification describes that the copolyesters are prepared from blocks A) and B) and that additional monomers may be present, such as polyethylene glycols having a molecular weight of from 62 to less than 450. (See specification, page 5, lines 8-12 and Morris, 127 F.3d at 1054-1055, 44 USPQ2d at 1027 (Fed. Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the claimed block copolyesters, being the sole ingredient of the lubricant component, are formed from blocks A) and B), the recited interconnectors and may be formed from additional unrecited monomers. Yet, the block copolyesters must provide filaments with the necessary surface slip. The Prior Art Yanai, U.S. Patent No. 4,725,500 Page 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007