The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte RICHARD J. DISCHLER, JIM KLUMPP, and REINHARD SCHUMANN _____________ Appeal No. 1997-3792 Application No. 08/321,3341 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges. MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-3, 5, and 7-13. Claim 6 has been canceled and claim 4 stands objected to for depending on a rejected claim. We reverse all of the 1Application filed October 11, 1994.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007