Appeal No. 1997-3915
Application No. 08/640,572
discussion in the references of the dopants and their
concentrations, nor to any disclosure regarding the shifts in
resistance, the examiner has failed to establish a prima facie
case of obviousness. Consequently, we cannot sustain the
obviousness rejection of claim 1.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claim 1 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
APG:clm
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007