THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 25 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte YAU-KAE SHELL and GARY HONG ____________ Appeal No. 1997-3916 Application No. 08/429,650 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges. LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 25-30, which are all of1 the claims pending in this application. An amendment was filed subsequent to the final rejection (Paper no. 14, filed July 1, 1996). The examiner1 approved entry of the amendment in a subsequent advisory action (Paper no. 15, mailed July 15, 1996).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007