Ex parte SHELL et al. - Page 1




                               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                        

                                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                                     
                                      (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                                     
                                             (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            

                                                                                                        Paper No.  25              

                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                       
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                        
                                                     AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                         Ex parte YAU-KAE SHELL and GARY HONG                                                      
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                                      Appeal No.  1997-3916                                                        
                                                    Application No.  08/429,650                                                    
                                                           ____________                                                            

                                                             ON BRIEF                                                              
                                                           ____________                                                            

               Before HAIRSTON, BARRETT, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  


                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                            
                       This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection  of claims 25-30, which are all of1                                           

               the claims pending in this application.                                                                             






                       An amendment was filed subsequent to the final rejection (Paper no. 14, filed July 1, 1996).  The examiner1                                                                                                          
               approved entry of the amendment in a subsequent advisory action (Paper no. 15, mailed July 15, 1996).               





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007