Ex parte SCHANDL et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 1997-3970                                                        
          Application No. 08/391,379                                                  


          comprises at least one electrical impedance in the cassette as              
          said indicator in said cassette, the impedance value of said                
          impedance defining the parameter for the indication of at                   
          least one characteristic value of a fixed element of said                   
          record carrier of said cassette, and                                        


          the at least one detection device of the apparatus is adapted               
          to detect the parameter defined by the impedance value of the               
          at least one impedance.                                                     

          The examiner relies on the following references:                            
          Sawada et al. (Sawada)        5,434,721                July 18,             
          1995                                                                        
          (filed May  26,                                                             
          1993)                                                                       
          Yoshii                        60-231989                Nov. 18,             
          1985    Ozawa                           02-201789         Aug.              
          09, 1990                                                                    
          Adel S. Sedra et al. (Sedra), Microelectronic Circuits, 2ND                 
          Edition, 1987 by CBS College Publishing, pages A-1 to A-13.                 
          The following rejections are before us on this appeal:                      
          1. Claims 2, 14, 15, 27, 28 and 35 stand rejected                           
          under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the                        
          disclosure of Ozawa.1                                                       
          2. Claims 2, 14, 15, 27, 28 and 35 stand rejected                           


               Our understanding of Ozawa and Yoshii is based upon translations provided by a contractor1                                                                     
          to the United States Patent and Trademark Office.  Copies of these translations are attached to this
          decision.                                                                   
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007