Ex parte SCHANDL et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 1997-3970                                                        
          Application No. 08/391,379                                                  


          Since the examiner improperly determined that the                           
          recitations of the independent claims were fully met by the                 
          disclosures of Ozawa or Sawada, the examiner has not addressed              
          the obviousness of modifying any of the applied prior art                   
          references to result in a cassette having an electrical                     
          impedance as set forth in the claimed invention.                            
          Consequently, the examiner has failed to establish a prima                  
          facie case of the obviousness of the appealed claims.  As                   
          noted by the case law cited above, failure to establish a                   
          prima facie case of obviousness requires that the rejection of              
          claims 3-13, 16-26 and 29-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 be                       
          reversed.                                                                   
















                                         11                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007