Appeal No. 1997-4069 Page 4
Application No. 08/282,913
Claims 1-8 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
obvious over Choi in view of Baerg. Claims 9-13 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Choi in view of
Baerg further in view of Huppenthal. Claims 15-17 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Choi in view of
Baerg further in view of Huppenthal even further in view of
Hurley. Claims 18-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
obvious over Choi in view of Hurley. Rather than repeat the
arguments of the appellant or examiner in toto, we refer the
reader to the briefs and answer for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered
the subject matter on appeal and the rejections advanced by
the examiner. Furthermore, we duly considered the arguments
and evidence of the appellant and examiner. After considering
the totality of the record, we are persuaded that the examiner
erred in rejecting claims 1-21. Accordingly, we reverse.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007