The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JACQUES ESPIE, DANIEL LABARRE and MAURICE REY ____________ Appeal No. 1997-4111 Application No. 08/540,947 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before CALVERT, COHEN, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. NASE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 7-9, 11 and 12. Claims 10 and 1 13 have been withdrawn from consideration under 37 CFR § 1.142(b) as being drawn to a nonelected invention. Claims 2, 5 and 6 have been canceled. 1Claim 1 was amended subsequent to the final rejection.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007